<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Openemr on OpenAdapt Blog</title><link>https://blog.openadapt.ai/tags/openemr/</link><description>Recent content in Openemr on OpenAdapt Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.164.0</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.openadapt.ai/tags/openemr/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>We ran it on a real EMR. The compiler won.</title><link>https://blog.openadapt.ai/posts/openemr-benchmark/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.openadapt.ai/posts/openemr-benchmark/</guid><description>Compiled workflows vs. a frontier computer-use agent on real OpenEMR: 20/20 vs 10/10 task success, 1.8x faster, $0 vs $0.55 per run in model spend — and with agent fallback, $0.029 vs $0.238 per successful run. Deterministic compilation wins on cost and latency, and never silently writes the wrong thing.</description></item></channel></rss>